With the "homemade" socialist power once again proves his talent to turn into a lousy idea regulatory quite respectable. It is the notion of "restaurant" itself should be regulated. As for bakeries. The less scrupulous would be entitled under the banner of "hearty meal" or "food bank."
After a litany of Arles who needed six attempts to see the day, the government pushed through Parliament a law on "homemade" which came into effect status lucu yesterday in conditions announcing the rat race. Admire the talent of recurring socialist power to transform into a lousy idea regulatory quite respectable. What is it? Signaled by a distinctive label in the magma of different forms of food, dishes prepared on the spot by an artisan chef to not be confused with industrial mixtures heated and assembled to order. And media praise the revolutionary aspect of this measure, as if we would finally be able to eat well in France. First departure from the original intent of the approach, inspired by professional tired of being in the same cloth that resellers of junk food, "homemade" is therefore not the "house fees". A dish prepared status lucu with whole frozen products, even if those are from a Romanian slaughterhouse, may benefit from the happy distinction where it has been cooked on site. He had to satisfy the requirement of some hotel unions including a large number of members, over-equipped in freezers, would not have been possible at the famous label if the condition had been fresh mandatory. No objection to vegetables and went through the cold to the extent that technology today has an exemplary level of quality fish is used. Except when it's not ... And then the swindlers will be housed in the same boat as honest status lucu men, to total customer knowledge, since not mentioned. Second transgression founding project, the only requirement of a transformation "in place" does not constitute a professional guarantee. Even worked there, shit remains shit. We always will prefer a shepherd's pie made in a factory in the state of the art, and gustatorily good, because there are more and more, a dubious puree topped with improbable meat uncertain committed in a pseudo bistro where the "flat of the day "is written on a slate. With the "home", the so-called local haunts arranged "the authentic" will obviously pull their chestnuts out of the fire. And the neophyte client fall into the trap. Certainly, abuse of opposing camp, where you simply heat in the microwave the contents of a plastic bag cut with scissors on which chives pose at the serve, are equally reprehensible. status lucu And like many restaurants play it both ways, not easy to isolate the wheat ...
Who will select the veal factories Tartemole to Tréfouilly les eateries? The real cooks bustling restaurant in a real need not be signaled by a logo virtue of their preparations because it is all their benefit that is homemade. Especially as their customers did not need that kind of guarantee for where to eat well. The "here we respect the customer" logo still has an aftertaste status lucu of a bad conscience. Involving admitting that there are two weights and two measures in their kitchen, one imagines the gene, if not shame, professional chefs now forced to publicly admit that, of the twenty dishes of their card (say five starters, five fish, five meats and five desserts), only eight or twelve are made on site from their hands. I bet that very few will be those taking the risk and that the house will sometimes forgotten. What image for a profession banded hats and stars ... And what about the dishes not distinguished by a "homemade", the overwhelming loneliness condemn the immediate rejection of the client? Who, sitting at the table and menu consultant, says: "I do not want this lamb stew prepared by the chef with seasonal vegetables, I prefer this stew in trays manufactured by factories status lucu Tartemole Tréfouilly- the-cheap restaurants "? But that joke is? The minister who passed this law it take consumers for a child of god? Hope he and require assemblers to convert to homemade? We dream.
The "Fraud" has lost more than 600 agents in five years! Additional hypocrisy of this
No comments:
Post a Comment