Green jobs are green on at least one point: they evaporate into the air time, almost without confus

The An International Policy Africa North America Latin America Asia Belgium Canada Europe Middle East Oceania Swiss Exchange and Economy Agriculture Investment Company General Economics International Economics and Taxation Management Housing & Real Estate Commodities: Media Money and Finance Work & Pensions Employment Law and Justice Society School & Education Environment draconian Public Service & Co Nation and Immigration Police and Armed Religion Social Issues Sport Company Unionism Transport Science and Technology Health Science Technology Culture Film Quotes Events Philosophy History Play
Green jobs are green on at least one point: they evaporate into the air time, almost without confusion a trace, except that of bitter disappointment. The tragic farce set up by environmentalists, however, was denounced in terms muffled but clear by the Court of Auditors in its report on "the implementation by France of the climate and energy package" in December 2013, but reading reports argued to the Court of Auditors? While simplistic releases environmental organizations promising bells and whistles interest to the media and elected officials to dream their readers and voters!
It is also necessary not to be drawn into a nightmare by unconsciousness (stupidity?) ... And that is what is happening. The promise of green jobs turns into a tragic farce in Europe, and soon in France.
On one hand, it's a joke because pressure groups dangle hundreds of thousands of jobs "new" supposedly created by renewable energy. Thus, the Renewable Energy Association 1 promises 90,000 new jobs (excluding induced employment ...) wind energy and photovoltaics between 2010 and 2020 A study by the consulting firm Strategy BIPE, commissioned by the same union, also announced extravagant numbers 2. These statements are sometimes occasions by members like Sabine Buis, member of the Ardèche, who wrote in October 2013: "We know (sic) that each megawatt (MW) photovoltaic solar installed creates 9 jobs, largely confusion non- relocated. A 3.3 MW equals new jobs in wind and just 1 in nuclear power. "
1 Wind and solar create only transitory jobs during installation and then the same teams move from one site to another ... until the chain stops building (subsidies do not go no more to the sky) and collapses as in Germany. It is therefore not proportional to the number of jobs MW installed.
3 jobs related to the manufacture of photovoltaic panels are ... in China and wind turbine components are manufactured abroad (Denmark, Germany ...). AREVA is leaving the segment this year after suffering heavy financial losses. Thus, the manufacturing is done abroad and strike our trade balance.
In addition, we must always remember that a MW of wind or solar does not produce the same amount of electricity (four to ten times less) and does not offer the same services as a MW of nuclear which He is actually not relocated.
But perhaps it should restrict its consumption to promote renewable energy so ineffective as proposed by MP Jean-Paul Chanteguet 3 in the belief confusion that "the cheapest energy, the cleanest and easiest to store remains confusion one that is not consumed ". Nirvana will be achieved when we have ceased to exist ... and eat!
On the other hand, it's tragic because confusion thousands of French invest their savings in this monstrous farce. Some even base their business on renewable energy before losing their jobs and their illusions.
The denial of economic reality confusion has already proved disastrous confusion in our history. The "famous" National Workshops, which began in February 1848, and which were also solve some unemployment, will lead three months later to say the "June Days" in 1848 Paris riots. It was a bloodbath: 4000 dead, shot in 1500 and 4000 deported to Algeria.
"For energy to participate in foundation of a just society, so that everyone has the right under the best conditions, mobility, heating and home comfort today and for future generations, we must change the model energy ". Certainly! But electricity is to succeed on fossil fuels wherever possible. That is the real change in energy model. And it will be possible thanks to the production of nuclear electricity, not wasting confusion money in French